IBG Bedford
QLD and QLT |
||||
Kit:
IBG # 72001 - 72003 |
Review Danilo
Carli
172normandyafv(at)gmail(dot)com Edited by F. Giovagnorio |
|
To have a 3 ton British lorry in
my
1/72 scale plastic kit collection I had little choice. Between the
types which
were used currently there is just the Bedford QL, aka “Lorry, 3-ton,
4x4, Bedford”, made by IBG. It
had a cab designed over the engine in a fashion still widely used today
and
common to the other lorries of its family, the Fordson WOT6, the Austin
K5 and
the Karrier K6. Behind the cab, different bodies for different purposes
formed
the QL family, sometimes identified by a third letter: * QL 6pdr portee – it had a
soft top cab. It transported a
6pdr that could fire forward on a modified flatbed. * The QLB and the QLW rear chassis was shortened by 12” (304.8 mm = 4.2 mm) after the rear spring hanger, ending 4” (101.6 mm = 1.4 mm) after the rear spring hanger. * Both QLB and QLW had the winch. Being made by 1941 until 1945, this lorry can be found in North Africa (where it was used also as 6pdr anti tank gun portee), Italy and Europe in British and Canadian service. Some were sent also to USSR. At the first glance, as for the IBG Universal Carrier I had reviewed, looking at the tiny pieces number also this kit could seem a 1/35 scale model. The kits I’m writing about are composed by two dark grey moulds, a transparent foil with the windows shaped printed (nice!), the decals set and the instruction. A lot of pieces compose the cab and the chassis while minor attention was dedicated to the bodies. The first impression is very good and apparently everything is ok; anyway during the cleaning of the pieces something didn’t look well. Although the pieces are flash free, I found some ugly deep sink marks on the axles (which are a bit thin) and on the fuel tank. During dry fitting the “face” of the truck seemed to be stretched. Drawings and photos comparison enhanced the problem and the windscreen looks having something wrong. The cab rear corners looked little rounded, the doors are too much flat and the rear plate deepness is short, resulting in wider doors. Close observation revealed other critical points, such as: the radiator mesh, the seats (which need to be reshaped), the thick fenders without moulding and the shallow body sides which miss some details. I knew that only the IBG was available on the 1/72 plastic kit, but when bought them my supplier told me to take a look at the Airfix kit too: “it is in 1/76 scale, but look very nice!” effectively it was and I bought it too, thinking to make it despite being a little smaller. Nicely the Airfix kit contains both lorries: a QLD and a QLT. Examining them together, I could appreciate how most of Airfix details looked better to me. Furthermore almost immediately I realized they had some dimensions very close despite the different scale.
About the overall length measurements I took them on models still missing the radiator brush guard, which gave a little shorter length. According to the drawings I used, IBG resulted a bit short (not counting the rear chassis endings which wrongly slightly over hanged the tailgate) while Airfix resulted being slightly longer despite dry fitting don’t allows precise measurements. The first surprise came when I compared the various parts taken from the two kits. Taking a look at the photos one can see the kits have close dimensions (and in some measurements Airfix is a little bigger!). I tried to understand if IBG was undersized or Airfix was oversized. Clearly the thing can be appreciated in larger measurements, because the 5% of 10 mm is 0.5 mm and smaller items are quite identical. So I took some measurements and compared to the drawings I had found.
Measurement comparison told me the cabs were very compatibles (height was measured from the fenders top). While the Airfix was very close to 1/76, the IBG was about a millimetre narrower. Furthermore the IBG front is even narrower (19.00 mm, Airfix 21.00 mm) and being a millimetre taller its wrong look is enhanced. The other dimension differences between the two cabs were within the millimetre. Airfix cab is also more detailed, having the radiator cap, the Bedford badge, the windshield hinges and others. Handling them, I found another critical piece was the chassis. Again the Airfix part looked better to me, but a dimensional problem arose. The width difference was about the 12.3%, too much for the scale differences.
Although I looked for it, I wasn’t able to find the needed dimension. At the end I wrote to some restored QL owner asking to measure it for me (I don’t want figure what the reader of the mail could have though about me). Nobody but one answered me. Very kindly Mr. Ian GLOVER of The Bedford Enthusiast Club sent me the correct dimension: 34 5/8 (34,625) inches. The measurements gave the Airfix very near to the 1/76 and just 0.8 mm narrower than the 1/72, while the IBG width was 1.0 mm oversized. The reason I was interested in such finicky matter was because also the IBG axles didn’t look well to me and had very ugly sink marks, while the Airfix one were nicely moulded and the conclusion of every comparisons led me to the idea to mate the Airfix kit and the IBG ones to have two models that can satisfy me. I have to say that I don’t like this way to modelling unless I have to make a different variant not available in kit, anyway in this case I find compulsory the use of two kits to have one single model. To make my lorries, an interesting info and very good photos of vehicles under restoring source can be found on HMVF site. I’ve attached some photos of a third kit, a QLD I’ve converted in a Fordson WOT6, to shows how use the kit tarpaulin and also how to use the kit in an optional way (although not for beginners).
QLD
This was the GS variant. 25,704 QLD were produced out of a total of 52,248 QL. During production, some variations were introduced. From a 1/72 modeller point of view, the most notable I found are the following:
On the basis of these features, the IBG QLD looks to be a hybrid: it has the late flanged hubs and the early fenders without the supports. The hip ring (closed by the fabric cap) is supplied on a closed roof and it could be considered as optional. The standard general service QLD had a flatbed body with squared wheelhouses protruding in the floor. Other variants had its own flatbed body, such as the QL gun portee, the QL fire tender (see IBG kit 72005) and the QLW. Aside the standard GS flatbed, a couple of variant can be seen.
About the standard flatbed body, close observation of the details of WW2 photos and of restored lorries photos I’ve could see, seem indicate some slightly different patterns were produced, I suppose because there were different makers. Apart the wooden bodies, I’ve seen the following steel body variants: 1. Side frame made by raised vertical “L” rods and flat horizontal strips. The vertical rods run under the lower edge and had a rounded end. 2. As point 1 with a diagonal strip in the first and last panel. 3. As point 1 with a more raised horizontal rod which runs at the wheelhouses level with slots for the tie down rope. 4. As point 3 with a diagonal strip in the first and last panel. 5. Side framed by raised vertical “L” rods and horizontal squared section rods. 6. As point 5 with the exception of the wheelhouse horizontal edge rod which was flat. 7. As point 5. The lower edge rod had a groove. 8. As point 5 with the exception of the lower horizontal edge rod which was flat. 9. As point 5 with the exception of the lower horizontal edge which had an “L” rod (upper one hidden by the tarpaulin). The tailgate could be wooden or metallic. About the body, again the Airfix overall look appeared better to me.
On the basis of my drawings the bodies are quiet correctly sized for both kits. The IBG tailgate is the steel type without the carved steps while the wooden Airfix one has them. The IBG body inside is totally flat, where Airfix depicts the floor planks (too much engraved) and the corner frame although the tailgate miss the inner planks lines. The details look better depicted by Airfix to me. I have to say few words about the tarpaulin too. No doubt, Airfix one is better. The IBG one looks very stiff and rigid, almost a hard top when it was a fabric cover on a “cage”. Furthermore is narrow, indeed it should overlaps the body sides while it has the same width of the panels and not of the raised frame. The front and the rear are flat without details of the openings. I choose to make a late 1943 production QLD. Here is what I did.
IBG/Airfix chassis
Airfix cab
IBG body
Decal The IBG kit depicts 6 QLD; very good but… only in Polish service! 5 are quite generic:
Just one has a specific identity:
QLT This was a trooper carrier. On the base of various
sources, a number between 2,500 and 3.373 were built. I’ve found two
batches numbered L559110-560479 and L560480-561979 ordered in December
1941 for a total of 2,870 troop carriers. Anyway 1,050 QLC from
Contract no.V4675 were converted in QLT between August 1941 and August
1942 for a total of 3920, in theory. I didn’t find its WD
numbers batch, however the QLTs L557330, L557670, L557752 and L557767
came from it. Accordingly to the production period, the QLTs I’ve seen
didn’t have the upper front mudguard supports and the cab roof hip
ring, anyway I can’t exclude some lorry could be updated during
deep maintenance. Airfix depicts correctly the QLT cab. For the cab and
the chassis I made the same job described for the QLD. The lengthened
body, built by four producers (1,700 by Austin Motor Co. and others
mostly by Marshall of Cambridge), needed a lengthened chassis. To keep
it, Bedford used the standard chassis with bolted on extensions. Basing
on the available photos a couple of variants were made. An interesting variant
was the closed body QLT TEV (Corps), where the acronym meant Terminal
Equipment Vehicle, which used the same QLT flatbed and lateral sides
(not the tailgate) on which was added the upper closed body (WD numbers
in the L5303008-L5305007 batch). IBG depicts the QLT
variant quite correctly, the only features out of place being the
flanged hubs. The different rear body is depicted by a different mould.
Sadly, the comparison tells us how much poorly it is depicted. The flat
inside without details, the ugly benches, the shallow details of the
sides, the tarpaulin, the missing details, every things look worst when
compared side by side to the Airfix body. Luckily most of the faults
can be solved. I didn’t find anything to do about the inner surface
which will remain flat. QLD body 1/72 1/76 IBG Airfix Length 53.3 50.5 53.9 51.3 Width 30.5 28.9 30.3 29.8 Height 11.0 10.7 11.3 10.6 Wheelhouse length 14.8 14.1 14.6 13.9 The cab and chassis
received the same cures described above, with two exceptions: Body Decal The IBG kit depicts 3 QLT Conclusion Despite its good impression when looked “in box”, both
kits resulted to be problematic to me as can be seen by the corrections
described above. My opinion can’t be positive. I chose to improve them
following my taste, but I’m quite finicky in such things; obviously
other modellers can make these kits out of the box and be satisfied or
can follow a different way to improve them. There is not a True Rule.
The kits could have a high potentials because the QL variants
conversions possibilities. The correction of the wrong parts is
strongly suggested. A thing I did not understand is the mould maker effort to
make separate tiny pieces (which could be well made also moulded on),
paired by a so little cure of other major details, such as the in the
bodies, or paired by dimensional errors which gave a bad rendition of
the cab. If one doesn’t mind the scale difference, the Airfix kit
is
the best choice to make these models by buying a single kit (which
contains both!). In any way, some not Polish decals in the QLD would be
appreciated.
|
Back to : IBG Kit List Kit Reviews |
Back to Home Page |
Article Last
Updated: |